Go ahead and express yourself right her. Who is she? Some of us truly want to hear.
There are places, one is called CoSA (Circles of Support and Accountability), which provides individuals tempted to commit acts of sexual abuse with counselling and a network of support. This is one organization that you can contact and discuss your desires to obtain support, so that you don't go out and ruin a young person's life.
That being said, I do realize that's not what you meant, however, studies have shown that the more someone indulges in fantasies about sexual contact with a minor the possibility of a sexual offense becomes far more likely. The last thing anyone needs is a bunch of deviants swapping degenerate stories and c********nography.
Just NO!!!!
There is a place you can.
Prison with the rest of the sickos
#2 "studies have shown that the more someone indulges in fantasies about sexual contact with a minor the possibility of a sexual offense becomes far more likely."
I'm not into kids, but I would like to hear about that study some more, because I have heard it is other way around and there are tons of practical proof to back it up too. That is why some people are even suggesting that only watching CP shouldn't be a criminal offence. Okay, I do not think that would be appropriate, but some professors etc. have suggested it.
But there is clear support for such thoughts. For example r**e rates are really low in a places where porn is freely available and also women are more free. This doesn't mean vanilla porn either, but really hard core porn with abuse and S&M theme etc.
What you are suggesting would be opposite, that porn would make people want to abuse and r**e more.
Some professors? Please provide some credible links. I studied psychology, with a focus on pathological behaviours. Do you know how they tell if a p**ophile continues to have sexual predilections towards minors? They attach sensory indicators on the genitalia and show them images/describe inappropriate situations. Showing someone deviant pornography distorts one's perceptions of appropriate and healthy sexual behaviour.
To your comment on availability of pornography, that is news to me, but watching porn is linked with erectile dysfunction, a skewed view of women and realistic sexual interactions.
"r**e rates are really low in a places where porn is freely available and also women are more free" If by that you mean that if the ratio of men to women is grossly disproportionate, of course, but the availability of pornography is not linked to fewer r**es, outside of a prison, lol. Check out PubMed, or go to your local library and read some articles in psychology journals, your views are obviously self-serving.
I don't need to provide citations for someone who clearly doesn't know what they are talking about. Don't be so lazy, educate yourself. This world is awash in ignorance.
Your reply reminds of pro gun advocates. I think these have to be the most self-serving and stupid of all people I've ever met. The stats speak for themselves, but unless I provide you with a citation you're not going to believe me, so why would I bother?
#6 "I studied psychology,"
How many hours?
"They attach sensory indicators on the genitalia and show them images/describe inappropriate situations."
You got to be kidding me, right? They do that ONLY in some US prisons where they hold sex offenders. But its only function is to see is the criminals dick still working and because of that, all the other countries won't use that device, because it doesn't prove anything to anyone.
My guess is, because you took that detail up, you are working on some "rehab center", prison, where they use that device and because that is considered a medical device, you must have "studied" how to use it, or how to tell the offender how to put that on. Am I right? Couple of hours of mandatory schooling doesn't make you professional of psychology.
Let me slice and dice it to you so you can understant what you just said. People use that device to study how much blood flows in the dick. They get the numbers and it only tells if the dick is stiff or not. Scientifically it doesn't tell anything else. Psychologically it doesn't tell anything else but when the dick is hard and when it is not hard. That device is not answering to the question "Why?"
It only shows what happens between the legs, period.
People who desinged that thing, are not the same people who use it for sex offenders. Nobody in the US require those "rehab center" owners to use it. There is no laws nor regulations to require prison owners to use it. It is not mandatory device, because people are not that stupid.
You only learned to use it and the people who told you to use it, are NOT psychologists. They are people who tries to keep the criminals off the street by making them hard over and over again, to "prove" that they are as bad as they were when they were put to jail.
I do not make any comment about it, because I think they should get much more worse sentence than electrified cock ring. But scientifically speaking the "proof" is the same as if you would keep the murderer in prison just because murderer can lift his arm up and he have enough strength to keep a knife in it.
That is how "scientific" that cock ring is. But I guess, you do not understand what I'm referring to, because life long sentence in the US is usually life long.
I'm saying that people who desinged that device are professionals of sexology. You and your superiors are not. I hope you understand the difference?
"that is news to me"
I'm not surprised, with your "education".
"but watching porn is linked with erectile dysfunction, a skewed view of women and realistic sexual interactions."
Oh really? Does watching Hollywood sex scenes have the same effect? Does daily masturbation without porn have the same effect? Did the VHS porn had the same effect?
Why the internet porn is the only evil?
I won't even ask you to provide those "studies" to me, because now I KNOW exactly where you have learned that. You have read a book and maybe also some forums where the author is active. Good for you. But you haven't read the critics, and this time I mean the actual scientific research, not just some whining from wankers. Bad for you.
"If by that you mean that if the ratio of men to women is grossly disproportionate, of course, but the availability of pornography is not linked to fewer r**es, outside of a prison, lol. Check out PubMed, or go to your local library and read some articles in psychology journals, your views are obviously self-serving."
Are you really serious?
To prove that your "education" is utter bullshit, here are three links. There are TONS of similar stuff from all over the world.
h******/w**.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2032762
h******/w**.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p ubmed/19665229
h******/w**. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/196022 21
"The stats speak for themselves"
They did? Where? When? How?
I won't bother with you anymore when your "education" is either from cock ring salesman teaching you how you teach a convicted sex offender how to use it, or from holier than thou BS book "Your Brain On Porn". Come back to discuss about this topic when you have educated yourself enough to actually know something.
