Depends on who you are - where you are - when you are.
would hairy legs and pits on a 20 year old, fit, nice face, great personality, english speaking contry woman turn you,personally, off?
If a womans body was covered from lower neck to feet with the same length and texture hair as my collie dog, and had a smooth hairless pretty face, I just might get to like them.
"....contry woman" - - - ?
Curious, what do you mean by that...?
You know, women did not shave legs nor arm pits until short skirts began to become fashionable in the 1920's.
The advent of women's stockings,silk,nylon or otherwise made shaving legs aesthetically more pleasing, I suppose.
String bikinis, perhaps circa 1970, seemed to start a trend toward shaving more and more exposed female skin to where we find ourselves now, with some people wanting shaven pubic areas.
"Attraction" is a very subjective thing - many variables come into play.
I think the beaver needs basic grooming just like hair on your face and head. I don't mind a rug, but if she is really fucking hairy then that is just unhygenic.
It's not that they are unattractive, it's just that clean shaven girls are more attractive.
I don't mind a girl with a little bush, but a hairy asshole is just yuck. There are so many products to help with the hair problem that it shouldn't take that much time to do some hair removal.
Bald pussy is much better to eat so keep it clean ladies!
hair is not unhygenic....not bathing is un hygenic
it is still not unusual to find women that don't save legs and pits in europe. saw it often when I was there.
I agree, it is not unhygenic. I keep my pussy shaved except when my monthly bill comes...as long as you wash down there, it is hygenic. Hair is not dirty it just doesn't look nice...and I suppose taste nice...my husband loves his head between my legs so I will keep it clean and shaved!