Straight Male / 46
Another Data Point
A few weeks ago now there was a post from a guy who was ashamed that he was cumming inside his pregnant GF, worried that the sperm might come into contact with the baby.
Some commentators dismissed the idea offhand, but others cited examples of how babies exposed that way had turned out different than babies from pregnancies where there was no sex during pregnancy.
I kept thinking about it, and I have another data point to share.
My wife and I have four children. Throughout her first pregnancy she was very horny. We would fuck maybe twice a day, and I would always creampie her.
Her second pregnancy was different. She was often sick. Her sex drive was low. She would either masturbate me while we kissed, or, if she wasn't too sick that day, she would give me a blowjob. (She doesn't like to swallow, so no sperm would have gotten to her stomach.)
The last two pregnancies were like the first, constant horniness, lots of sex and creampies.
Here's the thing... We have four daughters. Guess which one became a Lesbian?
Yes, our second daughter, though one not exposed to semen in the womb, became a Lesbian.
I'm not a scientist (and I went to a Christian high school, so we just learned Creationism), but the only logical conclusion from my data point and other cases mentioned a few weeks ago is...
If your baby is a girl you should keep fucking your wife and you should cum inside. Contact with the sperm will prevent a Lesbian gene from activating.
If your baby is a boy you should absolutely avoid cumming inside your wife. Contact with the semen risks activating a Gay gene.
Let me finish by saying that even though I am Christian, I think there is nothing wrong with being Lesbian or Gay. I love my Lesbian daughter as much as I love my Straight daughters. It's just that Straight people have an easier path in life. If I have to make the sacrifice of months of no sex, or maybe using condoms, or maybe pulling out (though can precum also affect a baby in the womb?), I am willing, if it gives my offspring an easier life.
Some commentators dismissed the idea offhand, but others cited examples of how babies exposed that way had turned out different than babies from pregnancies where there was no sex during pregnancy.
I kept thinking about it, and I have another data point to share.
My wife and I have four children. Throughout her first pregnancy she was very horny. We would fuck maybe twice a day, and I would always creampie her.
Her second pregnancy was different. She was often sick. Her sex drive was low. She would either masturbate me while we kissed, or, if she wasn't too sick that day, she would give me a blowjob. (She doesn't like to swallow, so no sperm would have gotten to her stomach.)
The last two pregnancies were like the first, constant horniness, lots of sex and creampies.
Here's the thing... We have four daughters. Guess which one became a Lesbian?
Yes, our second daughter, though one not exposed to semen in the womb, became a Lesbian.
I'm not a scientist (and I went to a Christian high school, so we just learned Creationism), but the only logical conclusion from my data point and other cases mentioned a few weeks ago is...
If your baby is a girl you should keep fucking your wife and you should cum inside. Contact with the sperm will prevent a Lesbian gene from activating.
If your baby is a boy you should absolutely avoid cumming inside your wife. Contact with the semen risks activating a Gay gene.
Let me finish by saying that even though I am Christian, I think there is nothing wrong with being Lesbian or Gay. I love my Lesbian daughter as much as I love my Straight daughters. It's just that Straight people have an easier path in life. If I have to make the sacrifice of months of no sex, or maybe using condoms, or maybe pulling out (though can precum also affect a baby in the womb?), I am willing, if it gives my offspring an easier life.
- That's Juicy! 4
- Remove It! 21
